How Do Nietzsche and Freud Differ in Their Evaluation of Civilisation Essay

How Do Nietzsche and Freud discord in Their Evaluation of Civilisation - Essay ExampleThis essay examines the extent the Freud and Nietzsche differ in their military rank of civilization. Analysis There are a number of overarching considerations in regards to Nietzsche and Freuds perspectives on civilization. whizz considers that in many regards both thinkers share a similar cynicism towards mass society. Nietzsche was greatly suspicious of the notion of faith and sought means of examining the underlining significance of moral actions, concluding that ultimately individuals were self-interested. Freud additionally questioned notions of selflessness (McGrath 1995, p. 111). Perhaps to a greater extent largely both thinkers recognized the prominence irrationality plays in civilization and human existence. While Freud embraced the western sandwich scientific tradition of social progress, Nietzsche largely disregarded these notions. In addition to his disregard of society in this way , Nietzsche also believed that, to a large-extent, social reforms were useless and impossible (McGrath 1995, p. 111). Nietzsche viewed society as constricted by too many rules and regulations that hindered ones pursuit of a richer and fuller human existence (McGrath 1995, p. 111). Freuds furiousness on scientific progress seems conflicted with Nietzsches abandonment of social reform. ... While Freuds texts more straightaway consider the thrust of civilization to a large extent Nietzsche focuses on the individual. One of Nietzsches well-nigh seminal works is Beyond Good and Evil. One of the earlier considerations in this text is Nietzsches condemnation of past philosophers as too readily embracing notions of truth (Nietzsche 2003, p. 20). This is a significant reflection as Nietzsche has considered that past perspectives on philosophy and civilization must be fundamentally reconsidered as base on erroneous assumptions. For instance, Nietzsche broadly criticized Socrates. Rather than constituting truth, Nietzsche argues that these past philosophical perspectives have merely sought to show a philosophical perspective as a means of advancing the moral prejudices of the philosopher (Nietzsche 2003, p. 20). For instance, rather than Socrates claims universe a legitimate claim to moral truth, Nietzsche argues that these beliefs merely serve to bolster Socrates self-interested position. This is a highly significant argument as in addition to criticizing the Western philosophical tradition, it criticizes many of the very foundational elements of society. Nietzsche notes, from every straits of view the erroneousness of the world in which we believe we live is the surest and firmest thing we can get our eyeball on (Nietzsche 1996, p. 34). While civilization through the Enlightenment had previously embraced the notion that humanity was inherently good, Nietzsche is positing in these regards that individuals must think beyond traditional notions of good and evil, as they are based an invalid premises. One considers Freuds perspective on many of these notions in his seminal text Civilization and Its