Job Satisfaction Perceived Efficacy Correlation Dissertation

Job Satisfaction Perceived Efficacy Correlation - Dissertation Example commonwealth and Sample The population for this study included all 139 South Dakota public prepare special education administrators, including full-time, part-time, and mixed responsibility special education administrators. The development used in the study was gathered from the South Dakota Department of Education 2010-2011 educational Directory. Data Collection Data collection included the use of tether separate surveys. Paul Spectors Job Satisfaction Survey was used to collect job satisfaction data. Chen, Gully, and Edens New General Self-Efficacy collection plate was used to collect perceived self-efficacy data. Finally, a researcher-developed demographic survey was utilized to collect demographic data. The survey was posted electronically and all 139 public school special education administrators in the state of South Dakota were invited to participate via email. Names and email addresses of special educa tion administrators were gathered from the South Dakota Department of Education 2010-2011 Educational Directory. A cover letter (see Appendix G) with instructions on how to access the electronic survey was sentto all public school special education administrators in the state of South Dakota, via email. ... The invitees completed 35 useable surveys, accounting for a study response rate of 25.2 percent. Demographics Selected demographic characteristics of the study respondents are presented in circuit card 4.1. The two largest groups of respondents were aged 36-50 and 50 and over, with each category making up 40 percent of the respondents, while those aged 35 or younger correspond 20 percent of the respondents. The majority of respondents were female, representing 71.4 percent. It is important to note that all demographics were computed using the responses provided by respondents. Not all respondents completed all questions. Masters Degrees represented the highest direct of educat ion for 40 percent of respondents, which was the largest group. Those holding a Bachelors Degree accounted for 22.9 percent of the respondents. Both the Education supererogatoryist and Doctorate degree each represented 20 percent of the respondents. The authorized certification question allowed respondents to check all that applied so that some respondents selected multiple current certifications. The largest number of respondents, 57.6 percent, responded that their current certification was Special Education Director. Pre-K-8 Principals accounted for 11.4, while 7-12 Secondary Principals comprised 6 percent of respondents. Similarly superintendents also accounted for 6 percent of respondents. One respondent selected Superintendent and Special Education Director, whizz respondent chose PK-12 Principal, Superintendent, and Special Education Director as his or her current level of certification, one respondent chose PK-8 Principal and Superintendent as his or her current level of c ertification, and one respondent selected PK-8 Principal, Superintendent and